On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:38:35PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > >>Maybe it's just me but is there not something more broken/alarming > >>with that or is just me and this is just acceptable from packaging > >>standpoint? > >Generally, the packages function without cron, so including a hard > >dependency might be overkill. An alternative would be to split the cron > >tasks into subpackages, but that too may seem like work in search of a real > >problem. > Sorry not following where do we draw the limit in that case? Right about *there*, apparently. If you think it should be different, a suggestion for the packaging rules is probably in order. But I don't think "packagers make a judgement call based on the requirements of their own package" is a terrible starting point. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
