On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 23.01.13 22:17, Adam Williamson (awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 19:47 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 22:47:18 +0000, >> > "\"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\"" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >b) >> > > >> > >We QA have alot of QA community members testing this so this does NOT >> > >require any additional effort or cause additional LOAD on the QA >> > >community. >> > >> > Aren't they just testing an upgrade of the default install? >> >> Correct: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_upgrade_fedup_cli_previous_desktop is the only current upgrade test case. >> >> We could plausibly extend the range somewhat to cover common package >> loadouts (GNOME, KDE, minimal perhaps) and common configuration wrinkles >> (non-US keyboard layout, encryption, a couple of different partition >> schemes), for _one_ upgrade method. Anything beyond that would be a bit >> of a stretch, I think. > > Wouldn't it make sense to test the "full install"? I doubt that you can install all packages without hitting conflicts. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
