On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 02:46 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 21.01.13 10:25, Daniel P. Berrange (berrange@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > The glibc maintainers don't seem to be against this idea and I am > > > willing to put time into design and implementation. > > > > Perhaps I'm misunderstanding what you're after, but doesn't "getaddrinfo_a" > > already provide an async version of getaddrinfo ? > > > > "Asynchronous Hostname Lookup API" > > http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/asynchnl.pdf > > > > That said I don't see the reverse - getnameinfo_a > > Brrrrh. It's designed around process signal delivery. I am > shuddering. Ew. Signals are not an event loop API. Signals are not an event loop API. Signals are not an event loop API. But apparently that's hard for some people to understand... Dan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
