On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:17:48 +0100 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > John Reiser wrote: > > I await documentation of claims that anaconda RAM requirements > > have been "skyrocketing" over the last several releases. > > The officially documented RAM requirements are, at least: > RHL 9: http://www.gurulabs.com/downloads/RELEASE-NOTES-RHL9.html > | Memory: > | - Minimum for text-mode: 64MB > | - Minimum for graphical: 128MB > | - Recommended for graphical: 192MB > F17: > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/Release_Notes/sect- > Release_Notes-Welcome_to_Fedora_17.html#sect-Release_Notes-Hardware_Overview > | Minimum RAM for text-mode: 768 MiB | Minimum RAM for graphical: 768 > MiB | Recommended RAM for graphical: 1152 MiB > A 12-fold increase since the inception of Fedora. > > (For F18, the memory requirements are entirely undocumented in the > release notes.) I have this strange sense of deja-vu. Like we have had this exact same thread/conversation before. Why yes, yes we have: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-November/173800.html Can you please stop the argument by repetition ? It's getting very very old. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
