Re: New packager: Do the reviewer and the sponsor have to be the same

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:30:04 +0100
Michael J Gruber <mjg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would like to help this poor soul get his package into Fedora:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249
> 
> (adobe-source-code-pro-fonts)
> 
> I'm a packager but no sponsor, he's no packager (so needs a sponsor).
> It's not clear to me whether I can just make a formal review and ask a
> sponsor to say "yes", or the new packager needs an actual review from
> a sponsor (different pages seem to disagree somewhat on this).
> 
> An old request for sponsorship on the fonts-SIG list has not been
> answered so far, which is why I'm trying to help this way.

Well, my opinion is: go for it. IMHO it's a lot easier to sponsor
someone who already has shown his/her packaging skills. It's just less
work for the sponsor... providing the review is of good quality.

Now, of course the package won't make it into the repo before the
packager has been sponsored.
-- 
Susi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux