On 01/16/2013 12:18 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Jochen Schmitt
<Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hallo,
for Fedora 17 we had a feature to make btrfs to the
standard filesystem of Fedora. This feature was defered
because the fsck utitlities for btrfs was not available
on the stable state for Fedora 17.
So, I would like to ask, if there any plans to make this to
a feautre for F-19. I think it may be sense to integreate
this feature to the rewrite of the part of anaconde which
is responsible for disc partitioning. In a article of the
c't magazin (a german computer magazin) I could read, that
this part of the new release of anaconda may be get any
more love.
Additionally, because I have read about an issue relating
btrfs with LVM2 on this mailing list and lost the thread, I
woould like to ask about the starte of this issue.
I'm waiting until Anaconda settles down before I pursue btrfs in
Fedora again. Things change too much and Btrfs is too reliant on the
anaconda part working properly to even bother trying to push it
through at this point. Thanks,
In flurry of activity in the last days before Fedora 18 was final, there
were a number of fixes made to anaconda to accommodate btrfs including
being able to put root, boot, or root+boot and an btrfs subvolume as
well as support for multi-device btrfs filesystems. While I am sure
there is more to do, is is usable.
However, while I have a great interest in btrfs because of its
potential, I do not believe that it is ready to be the default
filesystem yet.
A bug which has not been filed in bugzilla is not a bug. A bug report
in Fedora/RedHat bugzilla, which has not been reported upstream, is not
a bug as far as the btrfs developers are concerned because they are not
aware of its existence.
Gene
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
