-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri 18 Jan 2013 01:50:12 PM CST, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > The current "mediawiki" package is several years old at version 1.16. A > new package, named "mediawiki119" at version 1.19 has been reviewed[1] > and imported into Fedora. I understand some packages require multiple > versions to be available, but mediawiki does not require multiple packages. > > Why was "mediawiki119" given an approved review? > > I only knew about the "mediawiki119" package from the NRM bug[2] on > "mediawiki". The current version, 1.16, is riddled with security holes > and will not be updated by upstream. It is important that we either > update or retire with the current package. > > Can we work on merging the two packages? > > Michael > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820452 > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850937 mediawiki119 was approved for EPEL-6 only. It should never have been built for Fedora. I'm not sure why exactly that got built, but you are correct. mediawiki119 should be blocked from Fedora and built as 'mediawiki' instead. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlD5r9sACgkQeiVVYja6o6M7YgCfeIXtmuORY9FUeok2iUJ89Zga yFwAoKXPzBPVJAQEnY4VomK+m4sYS3Xu =cxlJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
