On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 23:45, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Russell Coker (russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > While creating a new problem for finding pid files... do you go > > > by the service name? The server name? Something else? > > > > How would the problem be any greater than it is right now? > > Right now it's basename of the process. Except in the case of /var/run/sm-client.pid which has a process base-name of "sendmail". I'm sure that there are other similar exceptions too. > > In terms of what > > name to use (service, server, or something else) it's exactly the same > > issue as we have at the moment with /var/run/something.pid. > > If you move to this new thing, do you do one dir per daemon? One > per process? Something else? One per security context. So have /var/run/sendmail for sendmail.pid and sm-client.pid as they are both part of the sendmail service. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
