Re: Current rawhide kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Current rawhide kernel?
From: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 01:31:36 +0200
In-reply-to: <20041006221719.GF28226@redhat.com> (Dave Jones's message of "Wed, 6 Oct 2004 18:17:19 -0400")
List-archive: </archives/fedora-devel-list>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1097100264.3434.4.camel@tiger> <20041006221719.GF28226@redhat.com>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux)

davej@xxxxxxxxxx (Dave Jones) writes:

>  > Should I be testing .541 or .590?
>
> .598 8-) Coming to a mirror near you. Soon.

Will an errata-kernel for FC2 appear also "soon"?



Enrico

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Current rawhide kernel?
  - From: Louis Garcia
- Re: Current rawhide kernel?
  - From: Dave Jones

Prev by Date: SELinux should be off by default in FC3
Next by Date: LVM should not be used by default with FC3
Previous by thread: Re: Current rawhide kernel?
Next by thread: Re: Current rawhide kernel?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]