On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:38:29AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:14:26 +0100 > Adam Tkac <atkac@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided > > to drop the "jpeg8 API/ABI" feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI. > > The main reason is that libjpeg upstream didn't present any valid > > argument for post-jpeg6 changes and libjpeg-turbo is not going to > > port all post-jpeg6 changes. The thread with related discussion is on > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30352465 > > > > I'm going to build the libjpeg-turbo pkg with jpeg6 API/ABI and then > > I will start with rebuilds of all dependent packages. This can > > probably happen during Friday. > > > > Any comments are welcome. > > Just a few. ;) > > 1. Are you expecting to do all the rebuilds in one day so they all land > in rawhide at the same time? If not, perhaps a side tag? Yes, rebuild will happen during one day. > 2. Do you have a list of affected packages? # repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires 'libjpeg.so.8()(64bit)' |wc -l 373 > 3. Many folks are going to be at fudcon friday, so the chances of > people being around to fix their packages, etc are low. Perhaps early > next week would be better to land this? I will use my provenpackager privileges and I will rebuild pkgs myself, as I did for jpeg6->jpeg8 ABI bump. I think it's good that people are away because buildroots will be broken for some time so people won't be affected :) Separate tag is not needed, I think. Regards, Adam -- Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
