-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:04:29 -0400 Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> escribió: > On 11/2/12 3:18 PM, Anthony Green wrote: > > Several months ago I attempted to upgrade libffi 3.0.10 to 3.0.11. > > The change was reverted because the soname change in this version of > > the library broke the build environment. I would still like to get > > 3.0.11 in Fedora. I don't anticipate any future ABI-breaking > > changes, and 3.0.12 will include additional ports like Aarch64, > > which is likely of interest to some Fedora developers. How do we > > coordinate a rebuild for dependent packages? Also, I assume this > > will have to wait 'til F18 is out (fine by me), but I'd like to deal > > with it early in the F19 cycle. > > It looks like libffi is emitted into the minimal buildroot (rpm-build > -> pkg-config -> glib2 -> libffi), so during the transition we'll > need to build both sonames of libffi. It might be worth keeping a > compat-libffi around for a release or two anyway, the current soname > has a _long_ history. I am right now building a compat-libffi package that has just the old .so nothing to be built against. so expect that early this week the .so of libffi will be bumped. Dennis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlD0TvoACgkQkSxm47BaWfeWkwCeN3gJR5lfWjgPwWYjpFeN/KTl 5/8AoJ4JaVMRJct2RsSG57QVHHk5flET =WBEh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
