Le mercredi 09 janvier 2013 à 09:24 -0500, Matthew Miller a écrit : > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 07:36:06AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > >I'm not sure I understand the question, actually. Can you elaborate? > > So you want us in the QA community to go through basically a copy > > concept of puppets/chefs and QA any "Formula" that has been > > submitted there? > > I didn't say what I want; I asked a question. > > Formulas would need rules akin to the RPM packaging guidelines and review > process. QA would certainly be an important part of that, although it > doesn't necessarily need to place more demand on the existing QE team. Or we could ask to people who use it to do the Q/A. > > There are several checks that happen when a spin gets created whilst > > this idea we would have to download each "formula" and test it. > > There's absolutely no reason that some rudimentarly testing of formulas > couldn't happen automatically. Since that's yaml, having a schema based on kwalify would be a first test : http://www.kuwata-lab.com/kwalify/ -- Michael Scherer -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
