On 08/01/2013 at 6:46 AM, "Bastien Nocera" <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 19:49 +0000, alex399@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> On 07/01/2013 at 7:40 PM, "Matthias Clasen" <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> >wrote: >> > >> >----- Original Message ----- >> > >> >> And is it possible to disable suspend on lid close but still >have >> >> GNOME lock the screen on lid close? No? Didn't think so... >> > >> >With the lid closed, your session will go idle, which will >> >eventually cause the screen to lock. >> >-- >> >> And is that the same as what I was asking? No? Didn't think so... >> >> It's little things like this that make GNOME a love-hate >relationship. >> Looks gorgeous and several things they've got really right, but >in >> many places it's still style over substance. > >We might even look at fixing your bug if you filed it upstream. No? >Didn't think so ;) > To go through that effort only to be ignored or lectured on the benefits of suspend? No thanks. It's more fun to rant on fedora-devel. Fix it if you want. I've done my bit :) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
