Re: rawhide report: 20121228 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:48:06 +0100
Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am very well aware of this fedpkg regression. It makes 40+ of my
> packages currently not buildable in F18 and rawhide.

I also noted the bug in my first reply in this thread. ;) 

> The bug was reported almost 2 month ago, and the fix for the bug was
> provided in a bugzilla comment just 3 days after the bug was reported,
> but no update implementing the fix has yet been provided. So the build
> system remains broken.

We have been very busy trying to get F18 out the door, and wanting to
push changes to fedpkg hasn't been high priority. :( 

I did talk with Dennis about this yesterday, and he's going to push the
patch out very soon. 

It's worth noting that you could change your specs to use a simpler
construct and they should work now. I agree making all them change now
is not good, but you might consider changing them as they are updated?

from: 
%if %{?fedora}%{!?fedora:0} >= 17 || %{?rhel}%{!?rhel:0} >= 7
to:
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 17 || 0%{?rhel} >= 7

It's shorter, it makes more sense to me and it works. :) 

Anyhow, we will try and get a fedpkg update out soon, and I am very
sorry for the delay. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux