On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 01:26 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 04.01.2013 01:21, schrieb drago01: > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Máirín Duffy <duffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Thu 03 Jan 2013 04:55:22 PM EST, Chris Murphy wrote: > >>> Documentation says "The GRUB menu defaults to being hidden, > >>> except on dual-boot systems." but as far as I know this hasn't been > true since Fedora 16 when GRUB2 started being used. Is there a > >>> plan to revert back to a hidden GRUB menu at some point or is the > current behavior stable? > >> > >> It should be hidden for final releases, but not for testing and > >> development releases. You may have upgraded from a beta or test > >> release, in which case your grub config file allowing it to be active > >> carried over when you upgraded to final. > > > > No it is indeed not hidden when GRUB2 is being used see > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737339 > > and why in the world needs th emenu to be hidden? Makes boot faster. It's not so much 'hidden' as '0 second timeout'. This was part of a feature for speeding up boot, several releases back. > i would love to also get rid of this useless submenu for > differenct kernel-versions and ALL the fancy stuff in GRUB > which is not needed for a clean system boot That all comes from upstream grub2. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel