On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > = Features/DualstackNetworking = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking (Sending to the list instead of using the wiki talk page to hopefully gather more information from networking experts. The recent-ish bugzilla activity in this space does suggest that this is a good topic to revisit in detail, thanks for taking the effort on.) 1. So what is the _precise_ scope of the ''proposed feature''? For example, does "glibc: name resolution must work properly" mean that you have some specific proposals to change glibc? (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Networking/NameResolution/ADDRCONFIG suggests changing glibc as one of the options. Have you decided which option you propose? In general, glibc maintainers' signoff or at least significant discussion would probably be required for any glibc change of this kind. FWIW, historically it was recommended to have AI_ADDRCONFIG enabled, see http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/userapi-ipv6.html .) 2. We already have a guideline requiring IPv6 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=PackagingGuidelines#Networking_Support ); to the extent that this feature would propose specific ways to use the API, the packaging guideline should point to documentation that describes the correct way. It would be great to get a wide review of the proposed approach before any extensive effort to modify many packages starts. Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
