On Thu, 20 Dec 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:
All this for the rather questionable benefit of having a specifically
defined place for helper-scripts-not-meant-to-be-executed-directly,
which gains us...what, exactly, over just putting them
in /usr/lib/(appname) or /usr/share/(appname) or whatever?
If you put it in /usr/lib/foo/ on 64bit machines, then I can see phasing
out libexec, but as an upstream with some scripts but also binary
helpers, I have consciously avoid the /usr/lib{64} usage and kept things
in libexec. In fact, I moved some stuff from /usr/lib*/foo/ to libexec
to get less headaches.
I don't see
that libexec is actually giving us some kind of huge win to justify the
inconveniences.
Sorry, what is the inconvenience of libexec?
Paul
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
