Re: QA-process for new packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please tell me what I need to do.  If I need to be a package reviewer
for shapelib, I'll do that.  If I need to lobby people inside Red Hat,
I'll try to do that.  I think it's hugely important that Fedora be a
good host for GIS software users and developers.

M

On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 08:49, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:47:25 -0400, Michael Tiemann wrote:
> 
> > Silke, I'll volunteer to be one of your reviewers.
> 
> Good to hear that. Though, Silke's packages are held up by packages
> at the bottom of their dependency chain, e.g. shapelib:
> 
>   https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=920
> 
> That package blocks four other tickets, so one would guess the
> packagers would try to get it released with higher priority. Would be
> much appreciated to get your comments there.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux