Re: Oldest package review resolved

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:47:09 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:

> What is truly amazing is that the submitter was FE-NEEDSPONSOR the whole 
> time. Kudos

Not really. It has been the submitter's only package review request.
Possibly without a request to become a co-maintainer of other packages
in the Fedora package collection. And the guidelines expect the sponsor
to be the reviewer of the first package to be included.

Sponsorship for the "packager" group is possible without making it
dependent on pending review requests (which sometimes are not completed
because of severe stability issues, licensing issues, or long-term
unbundling activity without an exception from the FPC, e.g.).

-- 
Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow) - Linux 3.6.10-5.fc18.x86_64
loadavg: 0.31 0.25 0.23
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux