On Dom, 2012-12-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ebru Arslan wrote: > I am using 32 bit Fedora 14 . our platform is Adlink cPCI-3970D and > this platform using Intel HD 3000 i915 graphic. > I install Base video mode. after that i dont achieve install intel > driver. > i need installation steps of xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 . libdrm > version,X-server version, etc. also create problem when i > make ./configure > but i already updated Fedora 14 . When I want update packages I do custom rpms, and recently use mock (*) to build the packages. #cd fedora-scm/ #git clone git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/xorg-x11-drv-intel.git #cd xorg-x11-drv-intel/ edit xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec change version to Version: 2.20.16 fedpkg mockbuild --root fedora-18-x86_64 (or fedora-14-x86_64) fedpkg mockbuild --root fedora-18-i386 (or fedora-14-i386) and finally rpm -Uvh the build rpms if not have mock and fedpkg in F14 you could try rpmbuild -ba xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec ... (*) my notes to use mock http://www.serjux.com/alps/how_to_use_mock.txt > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Ilyes Gouta <ilyes.gouta@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On Dec 15, 2012 9:48 PM, "Adam Williamson" > <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 20:54 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > > > Hi Adam, > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson > <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Would it be possible to pull in and package > > > xorg-x11-drv-intel driver > > > > updates more frequently in Fedora? > > > > > > > > > > > > These are kinda critical for the stability of > desktop/X. > > > > > > > > > It sucks if you use an 830 or 845, sure, but > that's not many > > > people any > > > more. > > > > > > > > > Nah, I have a GM45, and this particular update breaks the > desktop and > > > video acceleration (overlay) on my machine. > > > > > Let's just move to the latest xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 > update. I'll be > > > filing a bugzilla w/ the GPU lockup report. > > > > I'm confused. If this update breaks your system, why would > you want us > > to move to it? > > No, the 2.20.14 which is in updates-testing isn't stable. From > the changelog, the 2.20.16 looks like it has fixes for the > issues reported for GM45. > > -Ilyes > > > -- > > Adam Williamson > > Fedora QA Community Monkey > > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora > > http://www.happyassassin.net > > > > -- > > devel mailing list > > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
