On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:52:17 +0100 Remi Collet <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Le 13/12/2012 18:32, Honza Horak a écrit : > > > 1. continue shipping only mysql > > 2. ship mysql + mariadb, that would conflict > > Seems ok for 1 release. > > > 3. ship mysql + mariadb with adjusted file-names and using > > alternatives 4. ship mysql + mariadb with adjusted file-names but > > not using alternatives 5. drop mysql and ship only mariadb > > For me, the good target. > > > 6. is there any other? I think I am with Remi on the above... shipping both for 1 release would be potentially helpful in seeing issues, we can ask people to migrate at that time and file bugs, if the bugs are stoppers they can go back to mysql until fixed. I guess it depends on the maintainer(s) involved if they feel this would be worthwhile. Longer term I don't see too much advantage to continuing to ship both however, we should follow the better choice (as we did in cases like LibreOffice). kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
