On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Also, there was dissent already in the "auto-approving" of leaf-features >>> during the meeting discussion so I am not sure that auto-accepting of >>> Features in general given a lack of response is ever going to actually >>> happen. I personally wouldn't vote for it. > > > This proposal entirely avoids discussion of "leaf-features", "self contained > features" or "complex features with system-wide impact" since there will > never by any reasonable metrics you can apply to decide. If you can't decide > what feature you are dealing with, how you want to judge if FESCo should be > approving it or not. > > If some FESCo member thinks that is should be approved by FESCo, s/he still > has the power to open ticket for FESCo meeting. The same power as other > Fedora community members. > > Actually I would be very interested to hear why there should not be > "auto-approving". Please enlighten me. I explained my reasoning in the part of the email you cut off in your reply. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
