On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:09:29PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > From the COPYING file, it looks like the actual intention is to license > > under a BSD license with an exception for converting to GPL. But, Since the > > three-clause BSD license is used, it's my understanding that that's not > > really necessary. Since Red Hat holds the copyright and there do not appear > > to be any non-Red Hat authors, maybe the best thing to do would be simply to > > ask if we can relicense this as BSD 2-clause and be done with it? > I want the spec file to not be misleading, but I don't think involving > lawyers, only to simplify a license of 1789 lines of code, code that > is very liberally licensed in any case, is really worth the effort. Probably not. :) -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
