Re: [Bug 872826] f18 anaconda - no option to install bootloader to a partition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 02.12.2012 23:32, schrieb Felix Miata:
> On 2012-12-02 19:21 (GMT) bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx composed:
> 
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872826
> 
>> --- Comment #19 from Chris Murphy ---
>> Anaconda should not offer options that are expressly stated as not recommended
>> by upstream. The problem is ext4's boot sector is only 512 bytes, which is not
>> enough space. The use of --force fragments GRUB, and installs the pieces into
>> free space without informing the file system. At any future time the file
>> system can step on any one of those block lists and render the system
>> unbootable.
> 
> Upstream screwed up by replacing a bootloading system that can work acceptably on partitions with one that the very
> same devs claim cannot. Fedora should to compensate by providing an alternative to Grub2 that can do what multiboot
> users want. Grub2, Grub Legacy and Lilo are not the only bootloaders.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_boot_loaders

grub2 in fedora is crap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882721

grub was a bootloader, grub2 is a operating system with tons
of scripts some guys are calling "configuration" and full
of bugs

grub2 is fragile or why does F16/F17 not get the final version?
because maintainers fear it is more worse as beta6

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux