Am 02.12.2012 23:32, schrieb Felix Miata: > On 2012-12-02 19:21 (GMT) bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx composed: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872826 > >> --- Comment #19 from Chris Murphy --- >> Anaconda should not offer options that are expressly stated as not recommended >> by upstream. The problem is ext4's boot sector is only 512 bytes, which is not >> enough space. The use of --force fragments GRUB, and installs the pieces into >> free space without informing the file system. At any future time the file >> system can step on any one of those block lists and render the system >> unbootable. > > Upstream screwed up by replacing a bootloading system that can work acceptably on partitions with one that the very > same devs claim cannot. Fedora should to compensate by providing an alternative to Grub2 that can do what multiboot > users want. Grub2, Grub Legacy and Lilo are not the only bootloaders. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_boot_loaders grub2 in fedora is crap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882721 grub was a bootloader, grub2 is a operating system with tons of scripts some guys are calling "configuration" and full of bugs grub2 is fragile or why does F16/F17 not get the final version? because maintainers fear it is more worse as beta6
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
