On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 04:31:51PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > I think we do need more clarity on "system-wide/defaults changing features or > > critical path components". What's the threshold for defaults? (LVM, for a > > specific example.) What's the threshold for a change to a critical path > > component? > I don't think we need a strict definition; in the proposal anyone can > ask FESCo to consider a feature 'complex', so in practice, the > threshold would be "somebody asked FESCo to" (and of course, that > "somebody" can be the feature owner). Then I think this fails to address the primary problem. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
