Le dimanche 04 novembre 2012 à 13:19 -0500, Aleksandar Kurtakov a écrit : > The point is that such a measurement serves nothing but pissing off people. > You need to track activity on packages - how long bugs stay open without response > (note that this doesn't mean becoming accepted as one might be busy with other > things), how long the package stay with open CVEs, what is the usual delay for > getting to latest upstream, etc. Come up with strategy based on such measurement > and you'll get packagers support for some automated actions against packages (NOT > PEOPLE). > Measuring people activity means nothing as I think we want MORE people to work with > us not less (even if they do it once in a year). > P.S. The words in capital letters are such intentionally. While I agree that this may make lose some contributions, on the other hand, there is some team that have more aggressive pruning ( infrastructure team, for example ). And keeping inactive accounts could cause issue for voting ( ie, if we need for some reason to have a quorum of people ), and for sure could increase the work for various sysadmin tasks in some specific case ( like if we need to contact all users to make them change their password and check they did ). -- Michael Scherer -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
