Re: Rolling release model philosophy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 14:07:02 +0100
Simon Lukasik <isimluk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Currently, each Fedora release is kept alive for 13(+/-) months. There
were dozens of threads about shortening or prolonging period -- but I am
not sure if something like the following has been ever discussed:
Each N-th Fedora release -- where N%3==1 -- is alive for 7 months.
Each N-th Fedora release -- where N%3==2 -- is alive for 7 months.
Each N-th Fedora release -- where N%3==0 -- is alive for 19 months.

Additionally, maintainers might be encouraged to push their system wide
changes into N%3==1. As well as they might be encouraged to make the
Fedora N%3==0 their best bread.

+1
Just to be sure I understand: when N%3==1 or N%3==2, Fedora N is no longer supported as soon as Fedora N+1 is released, right?

The N%3 seems a little bit like RedHat vs. Fedora to me, with a rolling cycle of 6 Fedora releases rather than just 3. Indeed, AFAIU, every around 6 Fedora releases, a new (LTS) RedHat release is cooked (Fedora 13 => RedHat 6, Fedora 19 =>? RedHat 7).

-denis
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux