On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 00:26 +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le samedi 03 novembre 2012 à 07:46 -0500, Bruno Wolff III a écrit : > > > I'd rather see us do a better job with rawhide so that more people use it and > > a better job at making upgrades go smoother so that people just trying > > to get stuff done with Fedora have a better experience. > > Then the question is "Why people do not use rawhide", and "how can we > fix the issue so people use it". Maybe that's just perception, maybe > there is real recurrent issue to fix one way or another. > > I do not run it, so I cannot judge, but I think the first step to fix > something is to know the exact problems to fix. If the issue is "too > much breakage", how can we ensure the most annoying issues are prevented > ( I am pretty confident in autoQA personnaly ) ? We have on our todo list to 'enforce' the existing autoqa tests, for depcheck and upgrade path, but we're a little short on people ATM and everyone keeps getting roped into validation testing. I think enforcing depcheck for Rawhide would be going a bit far, though, because then you'd have to use a side tag to do soname bumps, so we kind of have a problem there: we can't blindly reject dependency-breaking changes to Rawhide, but that's the kind of thing that usually causes problems in Rawhide... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
