Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:45:02AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 19:32 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> 
> > I don't know if it's impossible to revert to the F17 anaconda at this
> > time, however it is clear that F18 is going to be the longest release
> > cycle we had in 9 years and somehow we need to avoid this in the
> > future.
> 
> It's not impossible, well, nothing is impossible, but at this point it's
> almost certainly more of a disruption than just plowing on with newui.

Also, I believe we haven't got close to the length of the Fedora Core
5 development cycle, which was more than 9 months.[1] Not that we
should aim for it either, but it's certainly not a given we'll even
get to that point.  Thanks for pointing out that everyone is trying
their best to avoid taking that prize.

* * *
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/HistoricalSchedules
-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
    The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux