On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 09:55 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: > Anyway, I think that neither of those solutions is far superior in any way. > Maybe I could drop all the renaming in the compat package and make it conflict > with guile-devel, but that there seems to be no agreement on whether it is or is > not a good solution. > > So, if nobody really objects, I'm going keep the current solution. For the record, I don't object. I think my way is The Right Way, as we all do ;), but you're correct that there really doesn't appear to be a consensus, and it doesn't seem like most people really _care_. So maybe this should just be left to packager discretion, I dunno. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
