On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 10:56 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: > Two minor exceptions have been added to the Licensing Guidelines: > > A new exception has been added to permit prebuilt binary QEMU ROMs > implementing BIOS or Firmware for QEMU system targets to be packaged in > those situations where it is not practical or possible to build them > from source, as long as the corresponding source code is also included > in the Source RPM package. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:SoftwareTypes#QEMU_ROMs > > The wording of the Binary Firmware exception has been amended slightly > to permit the packaging and inclusion of firmware files which are > necessary to boot Fedora on some devices (e.g. raspberrypi), as long as > the standard exception criteria are met. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:SoftwareTypes#Binary_Firmware I don't want to sound too alarmist, but these laser-focused changes aimed at the Pi seem slightly worrying to me in the context of: http://airlied.livejournal.com/76383.html If the firmware is as useless and anti-F/OSS as Dave suggests, do we really want to be letting it in? Should we be drawing a distinction between the two kinds of firmware Dave identifies in his blog post? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
