Re: Fixing Puppet in Fedora/EPEL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Yes, I understand that ... therefore you need two versions of puppet
> installed in parallel. There was proposal to prepare puppet3
> package, while I think that the correct way is to move puppet to
> version 3 and prepare new puppet2 or compat-puppet package.

That's probably correct for a new major release. It's not okay during the
lifecycle of a stable product, if we can avoid it. (Sometimes we can't.
We're not at "can't" yet for this.)

> Once you introduce version into the name, you will never be able to
> get rid of it, although puppet 4 might be 100% compatible with

That's not true. In the future, puppet can obsolete puppet3 -- for example,
in EPEL 7.

-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux