Hello, mate-screensaver maintainer:
leigh123linux wrote, at 10/23/2012 04:13 PM +9:00:
commit e8b3798a18387d3e05675f40c4ee5998e94d0dfd
Author: leigh123linux <leigh123linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Oct 23 08:13:31 2012 +0100
Initial import
.gitignore | 1 +
mate-screensaver.spec | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
sources | 1 +
3 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..ea3919d 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/mate-screensaver-1.4.0.tar.xz
diff --git a/mate-screensaver.spec b/mate-screensaver.spec
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b4c2afd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mate-screensaver.spec
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
<skip>
+%build
+%configure \
+ --disable-static \
+ --disable-schemas-install \
+ --with-xscreensaverdir=%{_datadir}/xscreensaver/config \
+ --with-xscreensaverhackdir=%{_libexecdir}/xscreensaver \
+ --enable-locking \
+ --enable-pam
+
Maybe mate-screensaver will use xscreensaver-foo.desktop under
%{_datadir}/applications/screensavers (in xscreensaver-extras-gss
and xscreensaver-gl-extras-gss) like gnome-screensaver 2.x?
If so, it may be better that I drop "Requires: gnome-screensaver" on
xscreensaver-extras-gss and xscreensaver-gl-extras-gss because
if gnome-screensaver user wants to use these desktop files he/she
will install gnome-screensaver beforehand anyway, and if mate-screensaver
user wants to use these desktop files he/she does not want to install
gnome-screensaver (and he/she will install mate-screensaver beforehand).
How do you think? I will appreciate your opinion
Regards,
Mamoru Tasaka
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
