On 10/18/2012 03:57 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> I'd say the current behaviour is the quite bad, as it leads to different
> results when building with fedpkg and rpmbuild on F18. The real fix
> afaics would be to revert the change and, if wanted, define rhel as 0 in
> Fedora's redhat-rpm-config, too -- but then we obviously need to fix all
> %{!?rhel:foo} statements in current spec files.
>
> Options? Spot, Simone?
Ignoring the fact that this behavior is explicitly what we document that
you should not do in a spec file, for precisely this reason...
There is currently no way to "undefine" a macro at the rpm commandline,
so barring rpm growing that support, setting %rhel to 0 is the only way
to address the original issue that I know of.
~tom
==
Fedora Project
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
