Re: FC2 kernel quality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 20:28, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 30.09.2004, 21:18 +0200 schrieb Enrico Scholz:
> > fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Thorsten Leemhuis) writes:
> > 
> > >> A possible solution would be the creation of a separate subpackage with
> > >> the kernel-headers. These are to be installed either directly at
> > >> /lib/modules/.../build, or (preferred) under /usr/src, /usr/share/... or
> > >> ... and make /lib/modules/.../build a symlink to this place.
> > > ...
> > > Problem: Users that want to compile kernel modules (Nvidia Drivers...)
> > > need to install the rpm.
> > 
> > I do not see the problem here. Only few software can be built without
> > additional packages (you need at least gcc, make, perhaps m4, bison,
> > ...). 
> 
> I see the problem. All those users of the nvidia driver will have
> problems to build the kernel module. And what will they search for to
> solve the problem: a kernel-source(code) rpm that is will not be part of
> FC3 (as it seems). 
> 

Ahh, so Redhat finally progressed from a kernel the users cant hope to
build to no kernel at all.

I only mention this as im on my 10th pass at trying to build a core 1
kernel, so im not bitter ;-)  What happens to the .configs RH use to
build the kernel, the supplied ones are decoration and seem to be no use
at all, or am I missing the point or just a plonker ? Please vote now !

Jon




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux