Am 18.10.2012 19:32, schrieb Adam Williamson: > Trying to come up with 'intuitive' names for commands strikes me as a > spectacularly worthless pursuit. I'm not sure it's possible. Does anyone > really learn a new system by typing their best guess as to what its > commands and parameters might be into a console?! yes! with "bash-completion" and double-<TAB> it is desirable in many situations and at least it is helpful also if read all the docs and do not exactly remember not so often used commands - "man unknown" is hard [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ system system-config-keyboard systemd-delta systemd-readahead-analyze systemctl systemd-detect-virt systemd-stdio-bridge systemd systemd-inhibit systemd-systemctl systemd-analyze systemd-journalctl systemd-sysv-convert systemd-ask-password systemd-loginctl systemd-tmpfiles systemd-cat systemd-machine-id-setup systemd-tty-ask-password-agent systemd-cgls systemd-notify systemsettings systemd-cgtop systemd-nspawn system-setup-keyboard [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ man systemd-journalctl..................
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
