Re: Blockerbugs 0.2 Released

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 13:04 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On 10/17/2012 01:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > properly. Also, if you later supersede the update before it gets
> > pushed stable, remember to make sure the new update is also marked
> > as fixing the bug. Thanks!
> > 
> ISTR that superseding bugs automatically inherit the list of fixed
> bugs from the bugs they supersede - has that changed?

I'm honestly not sure of the details but I know I've seen cases where
fixes somehow get 'lost' between updates. Obviously if you edit an
existing update there's no problem. If you submit a new one...I really
don't know. It may depend whether it's the same person submitting the
update, what's the 'master package' of the update...I guess Luke would
know for sure.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux