On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Panu Matilainen (pmatilai@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > Hmm, while on the topic of SRPMS - why do we have separate SRPMS disc > > > > images for x86_64 and i386 when the packages are build from the same > > > > SRPMS? > > > > > > The set of SRPMS in the composed trees is slightly different. > > > > Currently yes, but does it have to be? > > It's something that seems trival but isn't so trivial to whack > into the release scripts. Ok. I'm reading between the lines that you're not opposed to the idea of common SRPMS discs, just that it's "not feasible technically right now"? - Panu -
