On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 12:20 -0400, Alan Cox wrote: > I'd also like to know it is grovelling in pam related innards - do > we in fact need a libconsole library to wrap this from pam and utility sides ? That's a good idea, I agree. We probably can't do it for FC3 but should investigate afterwards, especially as we'll be using pam_console for more things.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
