Re: [Feature Suggestion] UsrMove continued

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I cannot agree enough. Just b/c we've blundered down a bad route doesn't mean you cannot turn back.

Instead of chiseling our way back, let's just revert and go.

Not every decision a distribution makes is a good one, lets not get caught up believing that we cannot make mistakes.

UsrMove was a mistake. End of discussion. Let's go back.


However, whether you believe this or not, UsrMove was at least an attempt to solve an actual potential problem- perceived redundancy in /bin and /lib and /usr/bin and /usr/lib.

I still don't see what problem this proposal would solve. To me it feels like a solution without a problem solely for the sake of tidiness in /.

Ben 
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux