On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:55:30PM -0400, John.Florian@xxxxxxxx wrote: > So maybe I should say that I think Fedora has always had it just about > right, IMHO. A very small, but functional system ready to grow and can do > so with its own tools. Yeah, but there's _so much_ room to quibble over what "functional" means there. For cloud JEOS images, I think we need less than that (because extremely ridiculously minimal is what people are asking for). > Makes sense, but can someone please tell me what "comps" stands for? I > mostly know what they're used for, but have never guessed the acronym. My > best guess just came to me after years of pondering: compilations? Anyway, > I feel rather stupid asking this Q, but hey "there's no stupid Qs, right?" > ;-) Once upon a time, the installer presented you with a dialog with the title "Components to install". (I believe this even *predates anaconda*.) This is the list of those components. The "comps file". -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
