On Tue, 09.10.12 10:06, Seth Vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Matthew Miller wrote: > > >On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:18:25PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >>To build such an image I'd really would have preferred not installing > >>the docs. It appears rpm once had a feature for that where you could add > >>excludedocs in rpmrc. This feature seems to have been removed. Why? Can > >>we get that back? Or can I enable this for yum in some other way? Anyone > >>has an idea? > > > >+1 to this, although note that we currently ship licenses as doc files, and > >so that might need to go by packaging/legal. > > > >There's a yum plugin which sets RPM transaction flags (yum-plugin-tsflags), > >and with that we could put "tsflags=nodocs" in the yum.conf. Not sure how to > >get that up to spin-creation tools, and if we're going to count on it it > >could probably use some polish and integration. > > > >>info > > > >Yeah that goes along with nodocs. :) > > > > > > --nodocs and tsflags=nodocs ends up with ugly ugly things when you > want to do rpm -Va later. > > nodocs 'works' but not in a pretty way But shouldn't we make it possible to make it work in a pretty way? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
