Miloslav Trmač (mitr@xxxxxxxx) said: > > is any current data > > available about how our minimal footprint got worse/better over time in > > both terms of packages and disk space, and which packages are to blame > > for it? > > > > If the libmicrohttpd dep really is problematic I am happy to split it > > off, but I'd really like some hard data first whether doing this would > > help more than a trivial bit to achieve a smaller minimal installation > > set. > > One more network-listening service, let alone an unauthenticated one, > is way "more than a trivial bit" IMHO. Well, it *is* off by default. Checking the minimal install of the moment: Install 38 Packages (+160 Dependent packages) Total download size: 129 M Installed size: 505 M In that minimal install, the following disabled services exist: NetworkManager-wait-online.service autovt@.service console-getty.service console-shell.service debug-shell.service dnsmasq.service ip6tables.service iptables.service rdisc.service saslauthd.service wpa_supplicant.service systemd-journal-gatewayd.socket The follwing 'traditional' services are enabled: auditd.service sshd.service sm-client.service sendmail.service NetworkManager.service crond.service rsyslog.service Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
