On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 07:37:42PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote: >> We support a "minimal installation" target >> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MinimalPlatform ), and this >> really doesn't seem like something that should be included, for the >> same reason we don't ship a disabled-by-default ident or httpd in the >> minimal installation. > > I'm for a minimal installation. Let's be clear: what's the reason? 1) Ability to review - it much easier to verify security/sanity of files that are not there at all than of files that are present but supposedly unused. 2) Risk of enabling the service by mistake (which, given that journal-gatewayd will happily serve private log data to the whole internet AFAICS, is has a pretty bad impact in this particular case). 3) Overhead/downtime associated with upgrades of unused components (which wouldn't apply for a systemd subpackage here, but would apply to libmicrohttpd). 4) Disk space Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
