On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not at all.On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:24:40PM +0800, Robin Lee wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >>>>> "RL" == Robin Lee <cheeselee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> RL> Hi, all I want to follow the route [1] to bring up a new
> RL> packager.
>
> Then why not follow the procedure you referenced? It tells you what to
> do, which involves opening a ticket in the appropriate trac instance.
>
> - J<
>
> It is just the beginning at this moment. The candidate packager is still
> learning RPM packaging and below level that can be sponsored.
>
> I just thought that the 'newpackager' is the group for such kind of new
> contributors. People in this group can have access to limited group of packages
> and cannot own any package. But, after all, the group is not existing.
>
> So, that means new willing contributors can only co-maintain the package by
> sending patches and filing bugs, instead of having direct commit privilege to
> the Git repo?
>
If you are willing to mentor the new packager, then they can be sponsored
into the packager group.
If you are not a sponsor yourself, you open a ticket in fesco's trac stating
who you'd like to have sponosred and that you will be mentoring them as they
comaintain which package with you.
-Toshio
At this moment I don't approve him to be sponsored.
So at this moment, can he only send patches to me to co-maintain the package? Can he have git commit privilege to that single package?
robin
So at this moment, can he only send patches to me to co-maintain the package? Can he have git commit privilege to that single package?
robin
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel