On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 10:42 +0100, Ian Malone wrote: > On 26 September 2012 01:04, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 01:25 +0100, Ian Malone wrote: > > > > > All official Fedora composes are done using spin-kickstarts git, not the > > packaged spin-kickstarts. The packaged spin-kickstarts tends to lag > > behind git rather a lot because it isn't actually used for anything, so > > people rarely bother to update it. > > > > > > > So that's a wrist slap for us, and for practical purposes, if you're > > doing any kind of Fedora re-spinning, use a git checkout of > > spin-kickstarts and pull regularly, do not use the packaged one. > > Okay, thanks. That seems to have fixed a number of issues for me. The > wodim/genisoimage problem I originally reported has stopped > complaining, though that seems to be because the package install order > reshuffles when new packages are added. I haven't reported bugs in > them as neither is in bugzilla and not quite sure where to report > that. They both come from the 'cdrkit' .src.rpm, so you'd want the 'cdrkit' component in Bugzilla. Bugzilla goes by .src.rpm name not binary rpm name. rpm -qi can tell you the .src.rpm from which any binary package was built. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
