Re: F17: DirectFB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The core issue behind why dfbinfo doesn't run as a "normal" user is due
> to the fact that the Linux kernel requires CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG to do any
> TTY ioctl() calls. UID 0 (root) has that, but normal users do not. It is
> possible to give a binary that capability using the "setcap" command.
>
> The missing udev rules also factor into this, I suspect.
>
> Last but not least, I believe a normal user needs to be in at least the
> "tty" and "video" groups. (and they need to be active, as reported by
> `groups`). Since there is no real way to handle this in the package, it
> just needs to be done by any user who wants to use dfbinfo:
>
>    usermod -a -G tty video USERNAME
>
> I made an updated package (1.6.1) that has these fixes applied and sets
> the CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG capability to the dfbinfo binary. (Other DirectFB
> binaries probably need the same magic, but as I am not a DirectFB user,
> I can't really say which ones.)

Per http://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2522 , giving the
program CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG is basically equivalent to making it
setuid-root.  Was the code designed to be run in such a risky setup?
    Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux