On Tue, 21.08.12 16:52, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johannbg@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On 08/21/2012 02:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >However, the person who is sending these bugs reports is > >(a) in a much better position to change the packages because they > >understand the problem and the solution, and (b) ought to take on this > >work because that's part of whatever feature/cleanup/etc they are > >proposing, instead of pushing part of that work off to everyone else. > > That's how I *initially* though the feature process worked as in the > feature owner always has to do all the work. > > Then again I suspect not many maintainers will do this change since > if I'm not mistaken it a) means they have to have separated spec > files for <F18 and b) will break everybody's upgrade path since if > I'm not mistaken preset *resets* units enable/disablement *again* ( > it happens when the legacy sysv to systemd migration takes place > )... No, presets don't reset existing enablement/disablement status. Presets only matter with the initial installation of a package and when a package is converted from sysv to systemd, but do not matter if a package already uses systemd unit files, or just converts non-macro scriptlets to macro scriptlets. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
