Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Furthermore, a not-inconsequential consideration is proxy-karma. For
> example, I have in the past occasionally given karma +1 (and -1) on my
> own packages from users that did not have Fedora accounts (or couldn't
> manage to defeat the ogre that is FAS's CAPTCHA).

If Bodhi were to be designed for proxy karma it should allow the maintainer 
unlimited karma points so that they could act as a proxy for more than one 
user. Allowing one proxy karma point but not more than one would be a quite 
arbitrary restriction.

I'm not advocating this. I'm just pointing out a logical consequence that 
officially allowing proxy karma would have.

Björn Persson

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux