Re: twolame - legal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 09:47 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 08/16/2012 05:27 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote:
> I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a
> legal reason for that?
> 
> twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not mp3), which seems
> to be a free (as free of patents) codec. There was a similar discussion
> on Debian and they concluded that it's ok to have it on the official repos.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419597

Unfortunately, yes, this is legally blocked in Fedora at this time.
Yes, I assumed so. I'm mostly asking why, because it seems that there is no patent infringement issue with twolame.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux